樓主的斷句是有問題吧,能把整段貼上來嗎? crowd in 可以理解為擠入, dynamizing in可以理解為動(dòng)態(tài)填入. 還有就是benchmark 后面應(yīng)該是個(gè)句號(hào)吧.前面那個(gè)只是個(gè)標(biāo)題，內(nèi)容是將政府在公私合作里要主動(dòng)，占主導(dǎo)地位；后面那個(gè)的確是個(gè)冒號(hào)，我是這么理解的“擠入仍是作為一個(gè)XX的概念被使用”，后面是一種補(bǔ)充。Crowding in is a concept that — while defending the public sector — is still using as a benchmark the negative: the possibility that government investment crowds out private investment, by competing for the same limited amount of savings. 政府資金的涌入(雖然是在保護(hù)公共利益),也是被當(dāng)做一個(gè)負(fù)面評(píng)判的基準(zhǔn):在競(jìng)爭(zhēng)有限的存款方面,政府投資可能擠掉私人投資.