精品偷拍一区二区三区,亚洲精品永久 码,亚洲综合日韩精品欧美国产,亚洲国产日韩a在线亚洲

  • <center id="usuqs"></center>
  • 
    
  • 速求一篇英語(yǔ)作文,400到500字

    速求一篇英語(yǔ)作文,400到500字
    問(wèn)題是is violence ever justified?
    英語(yǔ)人氣:854 ℃時(shí)間:2019-07-31 10:54:35
    優(yōu)質(zhì)解答
    I have gotten several messages such as this one, and I thought I would
    circulate widely my response:
    "I am curious — and I hope you do not think that this is disrespectful. You do not
    strike me as a man who believes in god (I am an agnostic myself), and surely
    your cause is just. Since you appear to be condemned to death in the near
    future, What would be the consequences of your acquiring a weapon, and using it
    on some of these overzealous people? and have you thought of this?"
    [NOTE TO the Drug Enforcement Agency: This e-mail, along with all similar
    e-mails, has been completely removed from my computer, so please don't come into
    my house, again, and take my computer, again, just to find out who your enemies
    may be.]
    My response:
    Yes, I am an agnostic, but that would make me no more violence-prone than
    True Believers. Indeed, unlike, say, abortion-clinic bombers, I don't pretend I
    am "doing God's work" and that I will "find my reward in heaven."
    Besides, to "off" those who spout ideas I find harmful is very much like
    arresting a drug dealer — a dozen more are waiting to take his place. And you've created a martyr
    for an evil cause.
    My enemy is ignorance, not individuals.
    It is winning the war of ideas — though fact, logic, persuasion,
    and, yes, humor — that brings about lasting change.
    What we are facing today in America is not an evil dictator, like Hitler, who
    is the head of a snake, and once removed the snake will perish, but overgrown
    bureaucracies, like the Drug War, which is more like an anthill. No matter how
    many individual ants you kill one at a time, the colony goes on.
    Any idiot with a gun can kill. It takes clever perseverance to make lasting
    change.
    Socrates, Jesus, and Martin Luther King did more for their causes by dying
    for them than by killing for them. Not that I'm looking to be a martyr. Not that
    the Drug War NEEDS another martyr. But the Drug War certainly doesn't need a
    lone gunman, either.
    I am not a pacifist, however. If someone were physically coming at me with
    violence in his heart, I would have no trouble shooting his balls off. But the
    people who are coming at me now do so under rule of law, and that means the law
    must be changed, not that those who follow the law (or even make the law or
    endorse an unjust law) must be "eliminated" Michael Corleone style.
    If there is anything I believe in, it is that we have the right to do with
    our own person and property whatever we choose, as long as we do not encroach
    upon the equal rights of others to do whatever they choose with their person or
    property. This, I believe, is the true definition of "rule of law," the
    agreement by which we can live in a society that rises above the law of the
    jungle.
    This is heart of the Declaration of Independence:
    "WE hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal,
    that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that
    among these are Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness — That to secure these Rights,
    Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the
    Consent of the Governed, that whenever any Form of Government becomes
    destructive of these Ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish
    it, and to institute new Government, laying its Foundation on such Principles,
    and organizing its Powers in such Form, as to them shall seem most likely to
    effect their Safety and Happiness."
    This is what is laid out in the Preamble to the Constitution. In my view,
    this country is founded on that.
    "We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union,
    establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence,
    promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves
    and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United
    States of America."
    As has been proven with time and again, to "alter" the government in this
    country does not take violence, but education. My job is to get the country back
    into believing and living under the "supreme law" of the Constitution, not to
    kill those who are, while living under the same Constitutional protections,
    leading the country astray.
    Although I consider, for example, William J. Bennett to be the single most
    evil and hypocritical person in this country, I will defend with my life his
    right to be wrong. (In a sense, I am doing just that.) As long as he does not
    advocate picking up guns and killing the "pagans" such as myself, he can dance
    naked in front of me on a rifle range (what a distasteful image) and I will not
    lift my gun. (I might, however, pull out my video camera.) Besides, I'd much
    rather see him live to watch his ideas (and him) wither and go pathetically out
    of fashion. (They already are, and he knows it, as his book "The Death of
    Outrage" clearly indicates. He just pouts and pouts and wallows in his own
    self-destructive bile. That's much more enjoyable for me to watch than, say,
    hearing that someone shot him while yelling, "Sic Semper Tyrannous!")
    "I would give the devil himself benefit of law for mine own safety sake,"
    Robert Bolt had Thomas More saying in A Man for All Seasons. I believe
    this to be true.
    The Drug War is intellectually bankrupt, and the Internet is getting the
    truth (as in scientific fact) to millions more than ever before. The Drug War
    propaganda machine, who can afford to spend billions controlling information,
    now has thousands of new enemies online, hosting web sites for $14.95 a month,
    emanating the truth 24 hours a day.
    150 years ago John Stuart Mill, in On Liberty, I think, talked about
    the "collision" of ideas in a free marketplace of ideas, and from the light of
    that collision, the truth is there for all to see. I believe in this process. I
    believe it is happening. I believe change is happening at exponential rates.
    Murder drags the level of that discussion down to primordial levels and degrades
    those who take part in it. (Even most of those who are anti-abortion, for
    example, are repulsed by the abortion clinic bomb that permanently mangled the
    nurse and killed a doctor.)
    I support the high road of truth, facts, debate, and education, even if I'm
    not along to walk that road much longer, and even if lies, deception,
    repression, and ignorance are the direct cause of my death.
    Enjoy,

    親 ,這是我給你百度到的關(guān)于這個(gè)標(biāo)題的原創(chuàng)文章,你可以借鑒下,發(fā)表下您的個(gè)人看法就可以了.
    我來(lái)回答
    類(lèi)似推薦
    請(qǐng)使用1024x768 IE6.0或更高版本瀏覽器瀏覽本站點(diǎn),以保證最佳閱讀效果。本頁(yè)提供作業(yè)小助手,一起搜作業(yè)以及作業(yè)好幫手最新版!
    版權(quán)所有 CopyRight © 2012-2024 作業(yè)小助手 All Rights Reserved. 手機(jī)版