in comparison with 沒有修飾seven passengers 它是將 Minivans和most sport utility vehicles進(jìn)行比較,怎么會(huì)修飾passengers呢 把這句話多余部分去除,你可以這么看 In comparison with most sport utility vehicles...可能是我沒說清題目，這道是GMAT里的一道句子改錯(cuò)題，這兩個(gè)選項(xiàng)都是錯(cuò)的。A選項(xiàng)答案解析力明確的說了有修飾前面定語(yǔ)從句的歧義。我還是把原題全部貼上來(lái)給你吧，請(qǐng)看我的問題補(bǔ)充答案是不是選D??你前面給出的A選項(xiàng)怎么和后面補(bǔ)充的A選項(xiàng)不是同一句，順序錯(cuò)亂了？還有 句子末尾那個(gè)they是什么意思？以下是我的意見 不知道對(duì)不對(duì) 錯(cuò)了估計(jì)你就只有去問一下更專業(yè)的老師了A. Minivans carry as many as seven passengers and, compared with most sport utility vehicles, cost less,（與B選項(xiàng)同理 有歧義）B. Minivans, which carry as many as seven passengers, compared with most sport utility vehicles, they cost less,（這里的compared with 確實(shí)可以理解為修飾seven passengers，也可以理解為修飾Minivans ，如果理解為修飾seven passengers就是比較座位的多少了 應(yīng)該翻譯為 與大多數(shù)的運(yùn)動(dòng)型多用車相比，小型貨車最多可以載七個(gè)人，此外它價(jià)格更低（更劃算）。如果理解為修飾Minivans 則比較價(jià)格，則翻譯為與大多數(shù)的運(yùn)動(dòng)型多用車相比，可以載7人的小型貨車的價(jià)格更低（更劃算）。我覺得這句話最錯(cuò)誤的地方是有兩個(gè)主語(yǔ)，你看 which 和compared with引導(dǎo)的句子是都能被省略的，縮句后，句子就變?yōu)镸inivans，they cost less 明顯不對(duì) C. Minivans carry as many as seven passengers, in comparison with most sport utility vehicles, and have a lower cost, they（同B選項(xiàng) 有歧義）D. Minivans, carrying as many as seven passengers, compared with most sport utility vehicles, cost less,E. Minivans, which carry as many as seven passengers, compared with most sport utility vehicles the cost is lower, and they（這句也是 縮句后有兩個(gè)主語(yǔ)）呵呵，答案是A， D選項(xiàng)的錯(cuò)誤跟B選項(xiàng)一樣的， compared with 也會(huì)造成 修飾seven passenger的誤解?？茨愕幕卮?，你是不是覺得in comparison with和 compared with一樣，都有就近往前修飾的可能性