精品偷拍一区二区三区,亚洲精品永久 码,亚洲综合日韩精品欧美国产,亚洲国产日韩a在线亚洲

  • <center id="usuqs"></center>
  • 
    
  • 英語翻譯

    英語翻譯
    As it becomes apparent from the above mentioned models,and as also noted by Raz and Hillson (2005),the risk management processes presented have a great deal in common,suggesting that there is a universal consensus regarding what the risk management process should cover.Where there are apparent differences in processes,these are largely attributable to variations in terminology.This divergence in terminology as a matter of fact is one of the biggest problems towards standardization.The ISO/IEC (British Standards Institute,2002) definition guide was intended to create a common language for all risk standards documents,but this has not yet been reflected in currently available standards and methodologies.
    However,despite this important unevenness,all the above mentioned risk models and standards suggest a very similar process for risk management,with the following stages:
    • Initialization – Defining the Context,
    • Risk Identification,
    • Risk Analysis,
    • Risk Response,
    • Monitoring and Control,
    • Communication.
    The above-mentioned stages constitute the minimum common resultant of stages that are suggested in the risk management standards and models,since in some standards or models some additional elements beyond the central risk management process are included or a different scope of coverage is followed; certain standards cover mainly the risk management process itself,and ignore the aspects involved in establishing the organisational infrastructure needed to apply the process,or in some other cases,such as the COSO standard,they provide an integrated framework with other disciplines,e.g.internal control.
    The focus of this paper will however be primarily on the three first stages,i.e.initialization,risk identification and risk analysis.
    Considering program risk management and particularly large scale program risk management,as used in this paper,all presented standards / models tend to be quite general,without any particular specialization,leaving thus space for completely different approaches.Besides,it is interesting to note that none of these standards are currently used for certification purposes,though in some cases this has been proposed and is being actively pursued.Rather,they all provide guidance and advice,and encourage the adopting organisations to adapt them to their own needs.
    用翻譯器輔助也ok 只是麻煩理順下語句
    英語人氣:172 ℃時間:2020-04-18 14:01:42
    優(yōu)質(zhì)解答
    根據(jù)上述模型,Raz和Hillson也指出,目前的風(fēng)險管理過程中有很多相似之處,普遍的共識是關(guān)于風(fēng)險管理過程中應(yīng)包括些什么.當(dāng)在過程中有明顯的差異,這很大程度上是由于術(shù)語的變化.這種術(shù)語上的差異實(shí)際上是標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化的最大問題.ISO / IEC 定義指南的目的是為所有風(fēng)險標(biāo)準(zhǔn)文件創(chuàng)造一個通用的語言,但是這目前還沒有反映在現(xiàn)有的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)和方法上.
    盡管這很重要,所有上述風(fēng)險模型和標(biāo)準(zhǔn)都有非常類似的過程,其風(fēng)險管理的階段包括:
    背景-定義 初始化
    風(fēng)險識別
    風(fēng)險分析
    風(fēng)險應(yīng)對
    監(jiān)控
    通訊
    上述這些組成了風(fēng)險管理水平和模型最少的共同階段,因?yàn)樵谀承?biāo)準(zhǔn)或模型的一些附加元素,超出了中央風(fēng)險管理過程中所包含范圍;某些標(biāo)準(zhǔn)涵蓋了主要的風(fēng)險管理過程本身,而忽視了其他方面包括建立組織基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施,或在其他情況下,如COSO標(biāo)準(zhǔn),它們提供了一個集成框架與其它條例,例如內(nèi)部控制.
    本文的重點(diǎn)是前三個階段,即初始化、風(fēng)險識別、風(fēng)險分析.
    考慮到項(xiàng)目的風(fēng)險管理,特別是大型項(xiàng)目風(fēng)險管理,標(biāo)準(zhǔn)/模式都很一般有很多共同點(diǎn),沒有任何特別的專業(yè)化,因此給完全不同的方法留下了空間.除此之外,有趣的是,這些標(biāo)準(zhǔn)沒有目前用于鑒定的,雖然在某些情況下,這已經(jīng)被提出,正積極追求.相反,他們都提供了指導(dǎo)和建議,并鼓勵采用適應(yīng)自己需要的結(jié)構(gòu)
    我來回答
    類似推薦
    請使用1024x768 IE6.0或更高版本瀏覽器瀏覽本站點(diǎn),以保證最佳閱讀效果。本頁提供作業(yè)小助手,一起搜作業(yè)以及作業(yè)好幫手最新版!
    版權(quán)所有 CopyRight © 2012-2024 作業(yè)小助手 All Rights Reserved. 手機(jī)版