精品偷拍一区二区三区,亚洲精品永久 码,亚洲综合日韩精品欧美国产,亚洲国产日韩a在线亚洲

  • <center id="usuqs"></center>
  • 
    
  • 一個(gè)經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)問(wèn)題(英語(yǔ))英語(yǔ)回答

    一個(gè)經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)問(wèn)題(英語(yǔ))英語(yǔ)回答
    1.Suppose that the National Assembly passes a law requiring employers to provide employees some benefit (such as health care) that raises the cost of an employee by $4 per hour.
    (a) What effect does this employer mandate have on the demand for labor? (In answering this and the following questions, be quantitative when you can.)
    (b) If employees feel that their wage is increased by $4 per hour, what effect does this employer mandate have on the supply of labor?
    (c) If the wage is free to balance supply and demand for labor, how does this law affect the wage and the level of employment? Are employers better or worse off? Are employees better or worse off? Evaluate whether or not the law achieved what it desired to achieve.
    回答得好追加分?jǐn)?shù)!
    英語(yǔ)人氣:344 ℃時(shí)間:2020-03-27 16:00:20
    優(yōu)質(zhì)解答
    the demand for labor will decrease since the cost of an employee rise up.
    the supply of labor will increase because employers are benefitied
    when wage is free to balance supply and demand for labor,the subsequence of this law is that the labor supply curve move right and the demand curve move left,so this law maybe doesn't affect the level of employment and the wage will rise.Then employers worse off while employees better off.
    我來(lái)回答
    類似推薦
    請(qǐng)使用1024x768 IE6.0或更高版本瀏覽器瀏覽本站點(diǎn),以保證最佳閱讀效果。本頁(yè)提供作業(yè)小助手,一起搜作業(yè)以及作業(yè)好幫手最新版!
    版權(quán)所有 CopyRight © 2012-2024 作業(yè)小助手 All Rights Reserved. 手機(jī)版