精品偷拍一区二区三区,亚洲精品永久 码,亚洲综合日韩精品欧美国产,亚洲国产日韩a在线亚洲

  • <center id="usuqs"></center>
  • 
    
  • 英語(yǔ)翻譯

    英語(yǔ)翻譯
    Schwanen et al.(2001) maintained that metropolitan areas,both in old industrial countries and in developing countries,have evolved from mono-centric structures into poly-centric urban forms.However,they noted that literature on how mono-centric and poly-centric metropolitan structures affect travel behavior is polarized.The work of Schwanen et al.2001 summarized the conclusions obtained from research undertaken in this area.Some authors (e.g.,Gordon and Richardson 1997; Levinson and Kumar 1994) suggest that a de-concentrated structure tends to reduce commuting distance and commuting times.Scholars in this group adhere to the ‘co-location’ hypothesis,which states that firms and households periodically readjust spatially to achieve balanced average commuting distances and duration.Other authors (Cervero 1996; Newman and Kenworthy 1989; Ewing 1997) refute this positive view of the effect of poly-centricity on travel behavior and suggested that decentralization of firms and households has been a disaster for travel behavior.In terms of commuting times,Gordon et al.(1989) have found shorter commuting times for suburban residents than for central-city residents in metropolitan areas with at least three million inhabitants.Because of the stronger congestion effects in high-density mono-centric cities,travel times are higher there than in low-density suburban communities in poly-centric cities.Giuliano and Small (1993) pointed out that a poly-centric pattern of employment centers has a potential for shorter commuting times.Meanwhile,Cervero and Landis (1991) research results suggested that,although overall commuting times and distances may be stable or fall over time,the process of job decentralization may have increased the variation between individual workers.Cervero (1996) maintained that urban development,led by rising affluence,advancing technologies,and other mega-forces,had transformed from a predominant mono-centric form well-suited to point-to-point rail systems to poly-centric forms more conducive to the car and undermining the use of public transport.
    英語(yǔ)人氣:863 ℃時(shí)間:2020-05-08 06:31:16
    優(yōu)質(zhì)解答
    Schwanen等.(2001年)認(rèn)為,無論在大城市地區(qū)老工業(yè)國(guó)家和發(fā)展中國(guó)家,已經(jīng)從單一到聚為中心的結(jié)構(gòu)為中心的城市形態(tài).但是,他們指出,關(guān)于如何單中心與多中心的大都市體制的影響旅行的行為是兩極化的文獻(xiàn).在Schwanen等工作.
    摘自2001年在這一領(lǐng)域開展研究獲得的結(jié)論.有些作者(例如,戈登和理查德森1997年,萊文森和Kumar 1994)顯示,1日集中的結(jié)構(gòu)趨于減少交通距離和交通時(shí)間.在這組學(xué)者堅(jiān)持'一地兩檢'的假設(shè),其中指出,企業(yè)和家庭定期
    調(diào)整空間,以實(shí)現(xiàn)平衡的通勤距離和時(shí)間.其他作者(切爾韋羅1996;紐曼和肯沃西1989;尤因1997)駁斥這個(gè)聚為中心的旅游行為的影響持積極態(tài)度,并建議下放的企業(yè)和家庭一直是旅游行為的災(zāi)難.在上下班交通時(shí)間,戈登等條款.(1989)
    已經(jīng)發(fā)現(xiàn),矮個(gè)通勤中央比在大城市的城市的居民,至少有3萬居民,郊區(qū)的居民倍.由于在高密度單強(qiáng)擁塞的影響為中心的城市,較高的旅行時(shí)間有較低密度的郊區(qū)社區(qū)的多中心城市.朱利和?。?993)指出,第
    在聚就業(yè)服務(wù)中心為中心的模式,有一個(gè)較短的交通時(shí)間的潛力.與此同時(shí),切爾韋羅和蘭迪斯(1991)的研究結(jié)果表明,雖然總體上下班時(shí)間和距離,可隨著時(shí)間的推移保持穩(wěn)定或下降,職位權(quán)力下放進(jìn)程可能增加個(gè)體勞動(dòng)者之間的差異.切爾韋羅(1996)認(rèn)為,城市發(fā)展,日益富裕的領(lǐng)導(dǎo),推動(dòng)技術(shù)和其他超級(jí)力量,在從一個(gè)主要單中心的形式非常適合點(diǎn)對(duì)點(diǎn)點(diǎn)鐵路系統(tǒng),多中心的形式更有利于到汽車,破壞公共交通工具的使用.
    我來回答
    類似推薦
    請(qǐng)使用1024x768 IE6.0或更高版本瀏覽器瀏覽本站點(diǎn),以保證最佳閱讀效果。本頁(yè)提供作業(yè)小助手,一起搜作業(yè)以及作業(yè)好幫手最新版!
    版權(quán)所有 CopyRight © 2012-2024 作業(yè)小助手 All Rights Reserved. 手機(jī)版