精品偷拍一区二区三区,亚洲精品永久 码,亚洲综合日韩精品欧美国产,亚洲国产日韩a在线亚洲

  • <center id="usuqs"></center>
  • 
    
  • 請幫我翻譯一下·~不要谷歌謝謝

    請幫我翻譯一下·~不要谷歌謝謝
    The present study evaluated indication-based alerts during medication ordering. We found an interception rate of 0.25 errors per 1000 alerts. This is difficult to compare directly with other studies since our alerts are a non-random subset of all medication orders. As one comparison, Adelman et al13 identified a retract and re-order rate of 0.76/1000, of which 0.58/1000 were estimated to be wrong-patient errors. It would not be reasonable to compare our rate to that of Adelman et al, given that his relied on self-intercepted errors after submission of the order and ours was from interceptions prior to signature. Our interception rate may differ for those errors which may otherwise have been intercepted after submission. It would be very difficult to measure all wrong-patient medication errors as many do not produce harm, so careful measurement of adverse drug events would not suffice.
    英語人氣:234 ℃時間:2020-05-11 20:23:24
    優(yōu)質(zhì)解答
    本研究評估了在用藥的基礎(chǔ)的警報指示.我們發(fā)現(xiàn)0.25的錯誤警報的截留率每1000.這是很難與其他研究比較直接從我們的警報是所有醫(yī)囑的非隨機的子集.作為一個比較,阿德爾曼等[13]確定了收回和0.76/1000重新訂購率,其中0.58/1000估計為病人錯誤錯誤.它不會是合理的比較我們的速度,阿德爾曼等人,因為他依賴于自我截獲錯誤后的秩序,我們從之前的簽名被提交.我們的截留率可能為那些錯誤,否則可能被攔截后提交的不同.這將是非常難以衡量的許多不產(chǎn)生危害所有錯誤的病人用藥錯誤,藥物不良事件如此仔細的測量還不夠.
    我來回答
    類似推薦
    請使用1024x768 IE6.0或更高版本瀏覽器瀏覽本站點,以保證最佳閱讀效果。本頁提供作業(yè)小助手,一起搜作業(yè)以及作業(yè)好幫手最新版!
    版權(quán)所有 CopyRight © 2012-2024 作業(yè)小助手 All Rights Reserved. 手機版