精品偷拍一区二区三区,亚洲精品永久 码,亚洲综合日韩精品欧美国产,亚洲国产日韩a在线亚洲

  • <center id="usuqs"></center>
  • 
    
  • 關(guān)于GMAT邏輯的題

    關(guān)于GMAT邏輯的題
    Industrial accidents are more common when some of the people in safety-sensitive jobs have drinking problems than when none do.Since,even after treatment,people who have had drinking problems are somewhat more likely than other people to have drinking problems in the future,any employer trying to reduce the risk of accidents should bar anyone who has ever been treated for a drinking problem from holding a safety-sensitive job.
    Which of the following,if true,most seriously undermines the argument above?
    A.Some companies place employees who are being treated for drinking problems in residential programs and allow them several weeks of paid sick leave.
    B.Many accidents in the workplace are the result of errors by employees who do not hold safety-sensitive jobs.
    C.Workers who would permanently lose their jobs if they sought treatment for a drinking problem try instead to conceal their problem and continue working for as long as possible.
    D.People who hold safety-sensitive jobs are subject to stresses that can exacerbate any personal problems they may have,including drinking problems.
    E.Some industrial accidents are caused by equipment failure rather than by em
    C選項是如何起得削弱作用呢?
    英語人氣:994 ℃時間:2020-05-13 00:44:58
    優(yōu)質(zhì)解答
    (本人不是高手~)
    文章是說:喝酒已經(jīng)treatment的人,比一般人更容易引起事故.而且給出了建議:不要讓這種人再從事這種工作~
    b,d和e是扯淡的選項;
    a支持了文章觀點;
    c:為了能夠干這項活,瞞著不說比去treatment要好得多~ 文章的argument是說為了少點事故這個目的,提出了不讓這些人干活的方法;但是假如這樣做,人們就會隱瞞不報,這樣就無法達(dá)到“少點事故”的目的,從而削弱了argument~
    (表述能力不好,不知道您能不能看懂~)
    我來回答
    類似推薦
    請使用1024x768 IE6.0或更高版本瀏覽器瀏覽本站點,以保證最佳閱讀效果。本頁提供作業(yè)小助手,一起搜作業(yè)以及作業(yè)好幫手最新版!
    版權(quán)所有 CopyRight © 2012-2024 作業(yè)小助手 All Rights Reserved. 手機(jī)版