GRE寫作Argument的第31題!
31.The following appeared in the editorial section of a newsmagazine.
"Some states are creating new laws that restrict the use of of handheld cell phones by drivers of automobiles.Such legislation,however,is sheer folly.Although some people with cell phones undoubtedly cause problems on the road,including serious accidents,the majority do not.Besides,problems are also caused by drivers who are distracted by any number of other activities,from listening to the radio to disciplining children.Since there is no need to pass legislation restricting these and other such activities,it follows that there is no need to restrict people's freedom to use a device that they find convenient-or helpful in emergencies."
一些州正在制定新法律來禁止汽車駕駛員使用移動電話.然而這種立法是很愚蠢的.盡管有些擁有移動電話的人無疑將會在路上引發(fā)一些問題,包括嚴重事故,但大多數人并不會.而且,事故也同樣由于因其他行為而分心的駕駛員引發(fā),比如聽收音機和管教兒童.由于沒有必要通過立法來限制這些行為,因而也沒有必要限制人們使用他們認為方便或在緊急時有幫助的設備.
請問該題可以攻擊哪幾個方面呢?自己完全沒有思路……謝謝!
只需大概說下邏輯錯誤有幾個是什么就可以了