幫忙看個托福作文~~ 打個分~~
幫忙看個托福作文~~ 打個分~~
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The best way for governments to control energy conservation is to raise the prices of gasoline and electricity.
Control, the ability or powers to make someone or something do what you want, which always be used by authority, can’t make people really do the things what the government want. Despite of that some people argue that power can let the people under control, others hold the opposite idea and claim that power will never have a long control to people. in my point of view, the best way for government to conserve the gasoline and electricity can’t be to raise the price. My reasons are explored in detail as following.
The first and fore most reason that government shouldn’t use the tough way to control the energy. In early twentieth century, US government has a clause that banned the wine. That clause caused not only let people who love drinking to go to speakeasies or speaks, but also gave the chance for underworld organization bootlegged the wine to be millinery. There were hundreds of people dead of the underworld organization because the violence was their normal business tool. Until the people lost faith to the government, it abolished the clause. We can imagine that situation that the underworld organization will deal the electricity and gasoline.
Although the society will be mess if the government raises the price of gasoline and electricity, it isn’t the only explanation for government should not use this way to control the energy conservation. People may refuse to pay for the gasoline and electricity so that the electricity and gasoline may be used fro the people but can’t earn any money back which will make the loss of the electricity and gasoline growing more.
Admittedly, the prize can stop some people use electricity and gasoline, however, this way will lose huge amount of gasoline and electricity. In fact, there are really few of people will observe the clause.
To sum up, due to the above mentioned reasons, which sometimes correlate with each other to form and organic whole and thus become more persuasive than any single one of them, we can safely reach the conclusion that the government should not raise the price to control the electricity and gasoline because of the society and the lose of gasoline and electricity.
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The best way for governments to control energy conservation is to raise the prices of gasoline and electricity.
Control, the ability or powers to make someone or something do what you want, which always be used by authority, can’t make people really do the things what the government want. Despite of that some people argue that power can let the people under control, others hold the opposite idea and claim that power will never have a long control to people. in my point of view, the best way for government to conserve the gasoline and electricity can’t be to raise the price. My reasons are explored in detail as following.
The first and fore most reason that government shouldn’t use the tough way to control the energy. In early twentieth century, US government has a clause that banned the wine. That clause caused not only let people who love drinking to go to speakeasies or speaks, but also gave the chance for underworld organization bootlegged the wine to be millinery. There were hundreds of people dead of the underworld organization because the violence was their normal business tool. Until the people lost faith to the government, it abolished the clause. We can imagine that situation that the underworld organization will deal the electricity and gasoline.
Although the society will be mess if the government raises the price of gasoline and electricity, it isn’t the only explanation for government should not use this way to control the energy conservation. People may refuse to pay for the gasoline and electricity so that the electricity and gasoline may be used fro the people but can’t earn any money back which will make the loss of the electricity and gasoline growing more.
Admittedly, the prize can stop some people use electricity and gasoline, however, this way will lose huge amount of gasoline and electricity. In fact, there are really few of people will observe the clause.
To sum up, due to the above mentioned reasons, which sometimes correlate with each other to form and organic whole and thus become more persuasive than any single one of them, we can safely reach the conclusion that the government should not raise the price to control the electricity and gasoline because of the society and the lose of gasoline and electricity.
其他人氣:536 ℃時間:2020-06-13 21:37:45
優(yōu)質(zhì)解答
說實話吧,我覺得最多得3分.自始至終,我沒有看到明確的“為什么不能通過提價來保護能源”,你總是在打擦邊球,繞來繞去的,不切題.第一段的那個舉例我看不出來如何與你的論點聯(lián)系.第二段的解釋一是不夠詳細,二是我不知道...
我來回答
類似推薦
猜你喜歡
- 1給兩個原子的結(jié)構(gòu)示意圖,怎么表示兩種原子所形成的分子的化學(xué)式
- 2I won't tell you,that's a secret!
- 30.3MPa下空氣的密度是多少?求換算過程.
- 4201.304不銹鋼管的重量計算公式怎么算?
- 5Now let's talk about our food.
- 6一道科學(xué)物理題 公式 好的給分一根長25厘米,體積為5×10-6米3圓形均勻涂蠟的木棒
- 7小紅看一本科技書,看了3天,剩下121頁,如果用這樣的速度看4天就剩下全書的5分之2.這本書有多少頁.
- 8七年級下冊英語p35 3a翻譯
- 9客車和貨車同時從甲、乙兩地相對而行,6小時客車距乙地的距離是全程的12、5%,貨車超過中點54千米,已知貨
- 10求不等邊三角形的面積公式!
- 11亞硫酸鋇和硝酸反應(yīng)
- 12在RT三角形中,B為90度,AB為3cm,AC為5cm,要三角形ABC折疊,要C與A重合,得折痕DE,求三角形ABE面積