一
What can I say about Pixar? Amazing? Perfect? Got to see this at the Cannes Film Festival in France (went on a trip with my family) and Pixar gives us another instant classic: Up.
The movie focuses on 78-year old man Carl Fredrickson's (voiced by Edward Asner) life who always had a dream of going on a journey to South American to see the wilds of it. He buys thousands of balloons just to attach it to his house to float up in the sky. So, he starts with his journey up in the sky in his house with balloons attached to it. Suddenly, he's not alone and somebody's at the door while flying, it's a boy scout kid named Russell. He invites the boy with him on his journey to South America.
Just brilliant and simple story-telling, beautiful visuals as usual with Pixar, awesome voice work, funny and smart dialogue, beautiful score once again by Michael Giacchino & very, very enjoyable characters. Speaking of characters, the highlight of the film: Dug the Dog. A sort of "robot" dog that will have you have you in a lot of stitches each scene that dog is in and that was the case with me. Simply, one of the funniest characters Pixar ever made. Pete Doctor, one of the four Pixar directors (John Lassester, Andrew Stanton, Brad Bird) who directed Monster's Inc (2001) needs and should get nominated for his clever, genius and smart directing of this but if Stanton didn't get the nods for (Finding Nemo and WALL-E) and Bird for (The Incredibles & Ratatouille) which they should of been, then the Oscars are making another HUGE mistake for not nominating this guy for this movie.
Up is the funniest Pixar movie, funnier than the Toy Story movies, A Bug's Life & Finding Nemo which were the funniest, in my opinion. The movie is not just hilarious, it's emotional and sad at times. Like WALL-E, it focuses on the character feelings but not as magical as WALL-E. Still, Up is full of emotional, fun and hilarious proportions. Your in for a BIG ride in this!
二
I'm a little annoyed with Up right now, because it made me cry in the first 10 minutes. Crying at the end of a movie is easier to hide -- you can mutter about allergies or how too much computer time makes your eyes red. But crying at the beginning of the movie makes you feel like an awfully sappy wuss. Thank goodness I had big ol' 3-D glasses on, which at least managed to hide any telltale traces of weakness ... until I cried again at the end, damn it.
Up is the latest film from Pixar, and this time the main character is not a robot or rat or monster, but rather a little old man who looks like Spencer Tracy and occasionally growls like Clint Eastwood in Gran Torino. After his wife dies, Carl Fredericksen (Ed Asner) faces a lonely life ahead, possibly in a retirement community. He decides to have the adventure that he and his wife always dreamed of, and sets out for the quasi-legendary Paradise Falls in South America. His method of travel? The family home, lifted by an amazing canopy of balloons. However, he isn't alone ... he's inadvertently picked up an enthusiastic 8-year-old Wilderness Explorer, Russell (Jordan Nagai), who only wants to help.
As the movie progresses, Carl's house stops being a means for escape and adventure, and turns into a burden that the two explorers have to drag around with them. And the movie shifts from a sweet and slightly fantastic story about how an older man copes with loneliness and regret, into a comic action-adventure tale with a setting and characters that would be right at home in Warner Bros. cartoons, especially the "Road Runner" series. Only instead of Wile E. Coyote, Carl and Russell find the explorer who inspired Carl when he was Russell's age, Charles Muntz (Christopher Plummer).
Up moves smoothly from romance to drama to fantasy to comedy to action-adventure and then back to sentimental drama again, without jolting your emotions around too much. The sentimental parts are sweet but not cloying or overdone. On the other hand, the Carl-Russell relationship seemed a little too familiar to me, something we've encountered for decades, from "Dennis the Menace" to Bad Santa, without offering much that is new. I also would have liked Muntz to be a little less two-dimensional, so to speak. However, as a friend pointed out, Carl and Muntz have a wonderful dynamic that may remind you of not only Spencer Tracy but Kirk Douglas, together at last.
Co-director Pete Docter also directed Monsters, Inc., another Pixar comedy with some sweet moments and even a few that have you complaining about the allergies and the way that screen glare can make your eyes water. Bob Peterson, who contributed to scripts for Finding Nemo and other Pixar movies, co-directed and wrote the screenplay and voices one of the dogs. Pixar fans will appreciate the little touches typical of the studio's films -- of course John Ratzenberger has a role, this time as a construction worker, and there are a number of quick visual jokes that are impossible to catch in a single viewing.
It goes without saying, as it has for even the weaker Pixar entries, that the movie looks gorgeous. I saw Up in 3-D, found the 3-D effects to be very subtle ... so subtle that at times I wondered if parts of the film had been rendered into 3-D at all. The 3-D occasionally adds some depth of field that enhances the overall look of the movie, but for the most part you could do without it and not miss anything. I'm a little sorry that the one theater in town with 4K digital is only showing the movie in 3-D because I would love to see how a high-quality traditional screening fares in comparison.
Up is good enough to be included in arguments about which Pixar film is best, although I would still fight for Ratatouille, myself. Is Up a children's film with side jokes for adults, a family film, or a film that's made for grownups but has many elements that children also can enjoy? At times it seems to fit in any of these categories as well as others -- it would be a great date film -- but ultimately it boils down to being a very good movie that defies demographic categorization. In other words, if you're old enough to sit quietly through a feature film, go see it. (And bring tissues.)
希望能對你有幫助
《飛屋環(huán)游記》英語觀后感,
《飛屋環(huán)游記》英語觀后感,
英語人氣:462 ℃時間:2019-11-15 02:16:43
優(yōu)質(zhì)解答
我來回答
類似推薦
- 飛屋環(huán)游記英文影評,120詞左右,
- 飛屋環(huán)游記英語觀后感
- 飛屋環(huán)游記英文觀后感
- 飛屋環(huán)游記英文影評
- 求飛屋環(huán)游記的英文讀后感100~200詞.
- 定義在R上的偶函數(shù)f(x-2),當(dāng)x>-2時,f(x)=ex+1-2(e為自 然對數(shù)的底數(shù)),若存在k∈Z,使方程f(x)=0的實(shí)數(shù)根x0∈(k-1,k),則k的取值集合是
- There aren't any pens in the bag,______?A.are there B.aren't there C.are they D.aren't they
- 一道化學(xué)反應(yīng)速率計算題,急
- 5層磚混結(jié)構(gòu),建筑面積2700m2,條形基礎(chǔ),
- 請你設(shè)計一個從袋中取球的游戲,共有3種顏色的球,使取出紅球的可能件分別是黃球和藍(lán)球的3倍.
- 議論文怎么寫?怎么儲備素材?
- 遼寧省,選修選哪幾本學(xué)?
猜你喜歡
- 1證明tanβ/2=sinβ/(1+sinβ)=(1-cosβ)/sinβ
- 2用矮字組詞語、閱讀“水滴船”、、急急急!
- 3雪蓮果心是苦的能吃嗎
- 4把一個重為 2 牛的蘋果豎直向上拋出,蘋果在空中受到重力和空氣阻力的作用.若蘋果在上升和下降過程中所受合力的大小分別為F1、F2,則( ?。?A.Fl可能小于F2 B.Fl可能等于F2 C.Fl一定等于F
- 5我們定義一種運(yùn)算:F(X)=x的平方-3x-4.例如:f(2)=2的平方-3乘2-4.若f(a2+b2)=0,則a2+b2=
- 6開始轉(zhuǎn)化成沉淀與完全轉(zhuǎn)化成沉淀的區(qū)別
- 7五年級上冊1課近反義詞
- 8L have a pain in my back l catch a clod.
- 9Do you l like fly a kite?回答:
- 10數(shù)學(xué)題目 出租車收費(fèi)問題
- 11___it is to go for a picnic on such a fine day.
- 12一個小數(shù)的小數(shù)點(diǎn)向左移動兩位后,與原來的數(shù)的差是34.65,那么原數(shù)是_.