some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. （注意大小寫）Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the puishment. Disscuss both and give justified opinion.（改了一個詞,原先意思不明確）
While the new criminal act that has established, there are some individuals considering （用ing語法錯誤） the punishments should be varified（動詞會好一點） for each crimine according to the real situations. But other public think oppositely, they prefer the penalties must be equal（平等） for everyone.
先改到這哈,我先有事,回頭給你再看看
On one hand, the court should always make judgements according to the crimine’s motivation, which would shows the kindness and humanity of the court and jury. For example, a man is too hungry to live and he stole some food in order to survive, his motivation is not harmful to the socirty and he is not on purpose. Therefore, this can be consider as a small case and only give light punishment would be more fair to the man. In contrast, if there is another man who is really rich and just steal food as a habit, he might need more lessones rather than just use the fixed punishments to teach him.
On the other hand, same punishments from the fixed law would be much easier for the court to make judgements, also they have clearly evidences to approve their decisions. In addition, it presents justice and equity to the public by obey the law.
In my opinion, punishments should consider different cases will be more appropriate in the modern society. Everyone would meet some difficulties during life time. Therefore punishments and law could be more humanity while people are not deliberately to break the law.
In conclusion, both opinions could work in the court, but it is better to implement depends on the reality.我來幫他解答
輸入內(nèi)容已經(jīng)達(dá)到長度限制
還能輸入 9999 字
插入圖片刪除圖片插入地圖刪除地圖插入視頻視頻地圖