精品偷拍一区二区三区,亚洲精品永久 码,亚洲综合日韩精品欧美国产,亚洲国产日韩a在线亚洲

  • <center id="usuqs"></center>
  • 
    
  • 英語翻譯

    英語翻譯
    Although the prevailing supposition has been that it is too hot for microorganisms to survive deep below the Earth's surface,some scientists argue that there are living communities of microorganisms there that have been cut off from surface life for millions of years.These scientists base their argument on the discovery of living microorganisms in samples of material that were taken from holes drilled as deep as 1.74 miles.The scientists' argument depends on which of the fol- lowing assumptions?
      (A)The microorganisms brought up were of a species that is related to those previously known to science.
      (B)No holes have been drilled into the Earth's surface to a distance deeper than 1.74 miles
      (C)The microorganisms did not come from surface soil that came into contact with the drilling equipment.
      (D) The stratum from which the samples came has been below the surface of the Earth ever sincethe Earth came into existence.
      (E) The temperature at the bottom of the holes drilled was not significantly hotter than that of the hottest spots on the Earth's surface.
    英語人氣:657 ℃時(shí)間:2020-04-26 04:22:27
    優(yōu)質(zhì)解答
    文章大致內(nèi)容是 以前科學(xué)家認(rèn)為大地深處溫度太高了,微生物無法生存.但是有些科學(xué)家認(rèn)為有微生物群生活在哪里.證據(jù)就是他們在1.74英里深的土壤樣本里發(fā)現(xiàn)了微生物.
    問題是科學(xué)家的假設(shè)是什么.
    我個(gè)人的觀點(diǎn)是一個(gè)假設(shè)是他們發(fā)現(xiàn)的微生物是原本存在于土壤樣本里的,而不是挖掘器械帶下去的.那么就是答案C了.這個(gè)答案比較直接.
    我來回答
    類似推薦
    請使用1024x768 IE6.0或更高版本瀏覽器瀏覽本站點(diǎn),以保證最佳閱讀效果。本頁提供作業(yè)小助手,一起搜作業(yè)以及作業(yè)好幫手最新版!
    版權(quán)所有 CopyRight © 2012-2024 作業(yè)小助手 All Rights Reserved. 手機(jī)版