這篇文章主要講的是:
法定最低工資線的調(diào)整對于就業(yè),市場勞動力資源分配的影響.
翻譯如下:
有關法定最低工資線的爭論主要圍繞于利益的再分配和因失業(yè)所帶來的損失的比較方面.有關最低工資所帶來的就業(yè)問題的爭論尤其激烈.Brown,Neumark和Wascher分別于1999年和2007年對于此爭論發(fā)表了全面的看法和觀點.
其實,最低工資線所帶來的影響并非局限于對失業(yè)的影響,它還會影響勞動力市場的配置效率,進而引起就業(yè)市場配置的低效率.雖然提升最低工資并不會對整個就業(yè)市場有很大影響,但是它的提高有可能導致勞動力資源分配失調(diào).比如說某些工人他們不愿意在目前舊的而且較低的工資底薪下工作,那么另一方面就必然會有那些擁有同等技能的而且愿意在目前這種舊制的底薪下提供勞務的人來完成這項工作.
在這個例子中,愿意接受較低保留工資的工人會被保留工資較高的工人所取代.這樣的資源分配失調(diào)所帶來的損失值等于這兩種保留工資的差額.正如Glaeser和Luttmer在2003所指出的一樣,這種損失是勞動力市場上典型的一級資源損失.當然在現(xiàn)實中最低工資的變動還是會對就業(yè)情況有所影響的.在下面的章節(jié)將會詳細介紹:由于最低工資線的調(diào)整會影響勞動力分配效率,這就解釋了最低工資線的調(diào)整幅度為什么會影響就業(yè)市場的變動.由于最低工資問題僅僅和少數(shù)工作能力不足的人有關,所以盡可能準確辨認出這些人并且精確計算最低工資所帶來的影響是很有必要的.
然而從長久來看,任何人憑借自身的技能所掙來的工資都會因很多因素的改變而改變,例如科技的進步和法定最低工資制度的改變.所以,如果要想將薪酬作為勞動技能的衡量標準,那么就一定要剔除這些法定的調(diào)整(最低工資調(diào)整)并回歸到技能本位.由于缺少證據(jù)能夠說明勞動力資源分配的失調(diào)是否承擔了將最低工資作為調(diào)節(jié)收入分配的一種工具,所以由最低工資線的調(diào)整對就業(yè)情況影響的評估工作和結(jié)果是值得進行和注意的.
我所發(fā)現(xiàn)的是,在由最低工資線的調(diào)整而有很大影響的地區(qū),工作技能不足的工人的失業(yè)率會大大提升,并且這樣的損失似乎在很大程度上被大量涌入的、工作能力不足的工人們所抵消.因此,盡管整個就業(yè)情況并沒有受到大的影響,但社會上一些工作技能不足的工人卻有可能成為了最低工資制度的受害者.
minimum wage的英譯漢
minimum wage的英譯漢
Debates about the minimum wage tend to center on the relative magnitudes of its redistributive benefits and unemployment costs.The debate about the employment effects of the minimum wage has been especially heated.Brown (1999) and Neumark and Wascher (2007) give comprehensive overviews of the debate on the possible employment cost
of the minimum wage.
However,the costs of the minimum wage are not necessarily limited to unemployment.The minimum wage also interferes with the allocative function of the labor market,which could lead to an inefficient allocation of workers to jobs .Even if the increase in the minimum wage has no impact on total employment,it can cause inefficient rationing.This happens if workers who were unwilling to work at the old and lower minimum wage end up in jobs that otherwise would have been filled by
workers of the same skill level who are willing to work at the old minimum wage.In this case,workers with reservation wages below the old minimum wage are displaced by workers with reservation wages above the old minimum wage.The deadweight loss of such inefficient rationing is equal to the difference between the reservation wages of these two types of workers and,as Glaeser and Luttmer (2003) point out,this deadweight loss is typically a first-order loss.In practice,of course,the
minimum wage can also affect the level of employment.As explained in more detail in Section below,the extent to which the minimum wage induces inefficient rationing can be inferred from changes in reservation wages after controlling for the change in reservation wages that can be accounted for by the change in employment.Because the minimum wage is only binding for a relatively small group of unskilled individuals,it is necessary to identify these individuals accurately in order to obtain precise estimates of minimum wage effects.
Over time,however,the wage that a person with a constant skill level earns may change for many reasons,such as changes in technology or in the minimum wage.Thus,to use the wage as a measure of skill,it is important to net out these state-specific changes in the returns to skill.While the lack of evidence of inefficient rationing bears favorably on using the minimum wage as an instrument for income redistribution,the estimates of the employment effects of the minimum wage suggest caution.
I find that employment among the unskilled drops significantly in states where the minimum wage had the greatest impact.This loss in employment seems to be largely offset by a gain in employment among the low-skilled.Hence,while total employment may not be significantly affected,some of the least skilled members of society are likely to be hurt
by the minimum wage.
Debates about the minimum wage tend to center on the relative magnitudes of its redistributive benefits and unemployment costs.The debate about the employment effects of the minimum wage has been especially heated.Brown (1999) and Neumark and Wascher (2007) give comprehensive overviews of the debate on the possible employment cost
of the minimum wage.
However,the costs of the minimum wage are not necessarily limited to unemployment.The minimum wage also interferes with the allocative function of the labor market,which could lead to an inefficient allocation of workers to jobs .Even if the increase in the minimum wage has no impact on total employment,it can cause inefficient rationing.This happens if workers who were unwilling to work at the old and lower minimum wage end up in jobs that otherwise would have been filled by
workers of the same skill level who are willing to work at the old minimum wage.In this case,workers with reservation wages below the old minimum wage are displaced by workers with reservation wages above the old minimum wage.The deadweight loss of such inefficient rationing is equal to the difference between the reservation wages of these two types of workers and,as Glaeser and Luttmer (2003) point out,this deadweight loss is typically a first-order loss.In practice,of course,the
minimum wage can also affect the level of employment.As explained in more detail in Section below,the extent to which the minimum wage induces inefficient rationing can be inferred from changes in reservation wages after controlling for the change in reservation wages that can be accounted for by the change in employment.Because the minimum wage is only binding for a relatively small group of unskilled individuals,it is necessary to identify these individuals accurately in order to obtain precise estimates of minimum wage effects.
Over time,however,the wage that a person with a constant skill level earns may change for many reasons,such as changes in technology or in the minimum wage.Thus,to use the wage as a measure of skill,it is important to net out these state-specific changes in the returns to skill.While the lack of evidence of inefficient rationing bears favorably on using the minimum wage as an instrument for income redistribution,the estimates of the employment effects of the minimum wage suggest caution.
I find that employment among the unskilled drops significantly in states where the minimum wage had the greatest impact.This loss in employment seems to be largely offset by a gain in employment among the low-skilled.Hence,while total employment may not be significantly affected,some of the least skilled members of society are likely to be hurt
by the minimum wage.
英語人氣:457 ℃時間:2020-06-21 12:33:10
優(yōu)質(zhì)解答
我來回答
類似推薦
- minimum wage rate
- Minimum wage hike becoming the
- “the bite of the minimum
- How much is it a clock in Canadian minimum wage is
- the newspaper reported that( having) the increase in the minimum wage,many people are still having trouble making ends m
- 陳蕃的“蕃”在這里的讀音是什么?
- But the one million people of the city,who thought little of these events,were asleep as usual that
- 線粒體的氧化磷酸化和葉綠體的光合磷酸化有什么共同點和不同點?
- 一個含30度角的直角三角形能否分割成2個全等的三角形
- 設f(x)=√x,g(x)=-x+a(a>0,a∈R),若不等式▏{f(x)+a[g(x)-2a]}/f(x)▕ ≤1對x∈[1,4]恒成立,求a的取值范圍.小弟拜謝!
- 熱帶魚最適合的溫度是幾度?
- 有關圓周率的知識
猜你喜歡
- 1用120個邊長是1cm的正方形,可以擺出 種面積是120平方厘米的長方形.
- 2m為何值時,方程組y=x+my2?4x?2y+1=0 (1)有兩組不相等的實數(shù)解; (2)有相同的兩組實數(shù)解; (3)無實數(shù)解.
- 3初一語文(下)主要復習什么?
- 4腦筋急轉(zhuǎn)彎:.How can you make a rope shorter without cutting or winding it?
- 5一根跳繩長五分之四米,這根跳繩的四分之三有多長?怎么算?
- 6人們在大自然中受到過哪些啟發(fā),有什么發(fā)明創(chuàng)造
- 7為什么before后面加being given而不是giving
- 8不要把污水直接排入河流英文怎么說
- 9兩個同體積的容器一個裝HCl氣體另一裝H2和CL2的混合氣體同溫同壓下,一定相同的是.
- 10五星村共有小麥的320公頃,玉米地比小麥地多1/4,這個村的玉米地比小麥地多多少公頃?玉米地有多少公頃?
- 11老外口中的的she average是什么意思
- 12大什么大什么,要成語的.