英文文章修改
I do not agree with this point of view.Because a country's development must be people-centered,democratic to make laws by the treaty.If you want to set up a bill must be democratic vote to decide whether to restrict the freedom of the people in general.I think that there is no democracy would not be a good country,these are relationships with people happiness.To achieve the public goal of equality is a very difficult task.Limit the power of freedom should not be attributed to the hands of the country,so the public can be submitted to convince hands.I think there are some similarities with the religion.
My option is that traditional political science theory with the hanes and smith are differences.The traditional view is that there is a vacuum and did not specify the African Americans oppressed by slavery,but the ambiguous power system.Hanes and Smith is very specific that the African American universal freedom and non-universal freedom of free bill period.
第二段中文意思（ 請(qǐng)好心人用自己的語(yǔ)言來(lái)幫忙翻譯一下）
我的意見(jiàn)是傳統(tǒng)政治學(xué)于hane and smith 是有不同區(qū)別的。在傳統(tǒng)理念看來(lái)，在一個(gè)真空期的時(shí)候用權(quán)力把美國(guó)黑人當(dāng)成奴隸所壓迫，然而使得這個(gè)國(guó)家的制度對(duì)美國(guó)黑人而言是遭受平等待遇。hanes and smith 具體的說(shuō)明了美國(guó)黑人的奴隸制度實(shí)行了多久和他們又是從什么時(shí)候解放的。