求雅思作文批改
求雅思作文批改
In this day and age,it is extensively acknowledged that improving living standard plays an increasingly key role in our society development.By the meantime,whether damage to environment is an inevitable result of improving living standard has sparked spirited debate.Some individuals assert it is an undoubted consequence.From my own perspective,I think this view is overly simplistic.
Convincing arguments can be made that we can improve our living standard through numerous eco-friendly ways,which will not destroy the environment.To start with,as the technology develops,the standard of living has been rapid improved.An increasing number of people would like to live closely to the nature so that they can have fresh air and relax themselves from all day work.Therefore,more trees have been planted,not only in the rural area,but also in the city,which will appeal to people’s need and even protect the environment.Besides,with the advanced technology,human beings have been exploiting new natural resources,which may be environmentally-friendly.More specifically,instead of using woods or coal to live in a high standard life,solar energy and wind power can be used in our daily life in order to make our lives better.Last but not least,as the standard of living improves,the awareness of protecting the environment has been on individuals’ minds.By that I mean,people use more eco-friendly tableware when they in a restaurant than what they did in the past and everyone is trying to recycle any useful resources for our generations and sustainable development.
Admittedly,damage to environment can,to some extent,be a consequence of improving living standard.This is due to the fact that a host of manufacturers who pay much attention to pursuing high profits instead of protecting environment always use less environmentally-friendly products and sell them to people.Evidently,according to their misleading,it may be the worst consequence to our environment.Even so,it is worth nothing that protecting environment plays a significant role in high standard lives.In other word,government should take measures to punish those who use improving living standard as an excuse to destroy environment and exploit more renewable resources.For instances,since sustainable development has been a major topic around the world,Chinese government pay much attention to protecting the environment and lay down some detailed laws about environment.
Based on all the arguments offered above,I would concede that damage to environment maybe a consequence to improve living standard,but not inevitable.Despite that,more eco-friendly action can be taken to improve living standard instead of destroy environment.on balance,I am convinced that every citizens with the government,should make contributions to the environment to avoid damaging it for improving the standard of living.
Damage to environment is an inevitable consequence of the improvement in the standard of living.To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In this day and age,it is extensively acknowledged that improving living standard plays an increasingly key role in our society development.By the meantime,whether damage to environment is an inevitable result of improving living standard has sparked spirited debate.Some individuals assert it is an undoubted consequence.From my own perspective,I think this view is overly simplistic.
Convincing arguments can be made that we can improve our living standard through numerous eco-friendly ways,which will not destroy the environment.To start with,as the technology develops,the standard of living has been rapid improved.An increasing number of people would like to live closely to the nature so that they can have fresh air and relax themselves from all day work.Therefore,more trees have been planted,not only in the rural area,but also in the city,which will appeal to people’s need and even protect the environment.Besides,with the advanced technology,human beings have been exploiting new natural resources,which may be environmentally-friendly.More specifically,instead of using woods or coal to live in a high standard life,solar energy and wind power can be used in our daily life in order to make our lives better.Last but not least,as the standard of living improves,the awareness of protecting the environment has been on individuals’ minds.By that I mean,people use more eco-friendly tableware when they in a restaurant than what they did in the past and everyone is trying to recycle any useful resources for our generations and sustainable development.
Admittedly,damage to environment can,to some extent,be a consequence of improving living standard.This is due to the fact that a host of manufacturers who pay much attention to pursuing high profits instead of protecting environment always use less environmentally-friendly products and sell them to people.Evidently,according to their misleading,it may be the worst consequence to our environment.Even so,it is worth nothing that protecting environment plays a significant role in high standard lives.In other word,government should take measures to punish those who use improving living standard as an excuse to destroy environment and exploit more renewable resources.For instances,since sustainable development has been a major topic around the world,Chinese government pay much attention to protecting the environment and lay down some detailed laws about environment.
Based on all the arguments offered above,I would concede that damage to environment maybe a consequence to improve living standard,but not inevitable.Despite that,more eco-friendly action can be taken to improve living standard instead of destroy environment.on balance,I am convinced that every citizens with the government,should make contributions to the environment to avoid damaging it for improving the standard of living.
Damage to environment is an inevitable consequence of the improvement in the standard of living.To what extent do you agree or disagree?
其他人氣:412 ℃時(shí)間:2020-04-11 18:45:45
優(yōu)質(zhì)解答
太長了看暈了,雅思作文要求是250字呢這最少有400多,太長照樣扣分,看不下去.第一人稱要的太多,連接介詞用錯(cuò)好幾個(gè),同樣單詞用的太頻繁,中式英語很嚴(yán)重
我來回答
類似推薦
- 求雅思作文批改
- 雅思作文求教,批改~
- 雅思作文 請(qǐng)求高手批改
- 雅思作文求打分求批改
- 求助雅思作文批改
- 150℃時(shí)若只有一半碳酸銨分解,產(chǎn)生的氣態(tài)混合物的密度是相同條件下氫氣密度的多少倍?
- 用天平稱一只雞蛋,但是把位置放錯(cuò)了,錯(cuò)誤的讀數(shù)是50、4克,這個(gè)雞蛋正確的質(zhì)量是多少克
- 蟬 結(jié)尾一句話在文中起什么作用?
- 0.3mol的O2與0.2mol的O3混合,混合氣體的密度對(duì)氫氣的相對(duì)密度是多少?
- (1+x)(2-x)(x2-2x-7)>0解不等式
- 有甲乙兩瓶油,甲瓶油的重量是乙瓶油1.8倍‘如果從甲瓶里倒出1.6千克,兩瓶油就相
- it was 劃線 a caterpillar
猜你喜歡
- 1Danny的名詞所有格
- 2“孟母三遷”這則故事可以用什么成語來說理?
- 3畫出定義域?yàn)閧x|-3≤x≤8,且x≠5},值域?yàn)閧y|-1≤y≤2,y≠0}的一個(gè)函數(shù)的圖象.如果平面直角坐標(biāo)系中點(diǎn)P(x,y)的坐標(biāo)滿足-3≤x≤8,-1≤y≤2,那么其中哪些點(diǎn)不能在圖象上?
- 4食鹽的溶解快慢與水的溫度是否有關(guān)的設(shè)計(jì)方案
- 5水的離子積為什么只和溫度相關(guān)
- 6橢圓x²/16+y²/12=1的離心率為
- 7水表的五位數(shù)代表什么,這水表的讀數(shù)是多少?
- 812?+2=90 12?+2=144 加 減 乘除 或括號(hào) 使等式成立
- 9竊讀記哪里寫作者如饑似可讀書
- 10即公大兄無奕女,左將軍王凝之妻也是什么句式
- 11當(dāng)半徑一定時(shí),同一行星的衛(wèi)星的線速度也一定嗎?
- 12英語翻譯