英語翻譯
That raises the question of whether the chief justice's performance conforms to his own stated goal:to be a "minimalist" judge who decides no more than necessary,an umpire simply calling balls and strikes.The answer is yes,and no.
"He's 'minimalist' in recognizing that the court is an ongoing enterprise with precedents and history and tradition," said Frederick Schauer,a professor at the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard."He is not coming in with a big new theory or a big new perspective."