一個史上巨難解釋的英語句子----不是高手勿進
Or do newborns simply prefer more to fewer?The same experiment,but with three spots shown before two,shows the same return of interest when the number of spots changes.Perhaps it is just the newness?When slightly older babies were shown cards with pictures of objects（a comb,a key,an orange and so on）,【changing the number of objects had an effect separate from changing the objects themselves.】Could it be the pattern that two things make,as opposed to three?【No again.】 Babies paid more attention to squares moving randomly on a screen when their number changed from two to three,or three to two.The effect even crosses between senses.
兩個問題句都用【】里括了起來
1、解釋【】里的句子中separate from changing the objects themselves中separate是什么詞?與have an effect 構(gòu)成短語嗎?
2、詳解no again,第一次見到這種用法,意思是不是“沒有再一次”的意思啊?但是與上一個句子不搭界.很是暈.這是固定短語嗎?還是一個語法項目.如果你能解釋清楚,不能,別作答.