求改下面一段英文,太多錯誤了
在第三個案例中,超市對張先生不承擔責任,建筑公司應對張先生受到的損害承擔無過錯和替代責任.原因是蘇是建筑公司的工人,他和建筑公司是存在著勞動關系的,并且蘇是在工作期間受傷并且造成顧客王先生的人身損害,故建筑公司應承擔無過錯替代責任.而超市既沒管理上的過失,蘇也不是超市的員工,所以超市可以以無過錯理由抗辯.
In the third case,the supermarket needn’t have to bear the vicarious reliability but the construction company.Su is the employee sent by construction,sue has the employment relations with construction company,in addition,Su get injured in the course of employment and caused the injure of Mr.zhang,so construction company should committed the vicarious reliability without fault.For supermarket,there isn’t any management false,Su isn’t the employee from it,so supermarket can defense by without false.