英語翻譯
英語翻譯
Many moons ago,Michael Milken,the director of low-grade bond research at Drexel,Burnham and Lambert,observed that investment in the corporate debt markets often reflected a “herd instinct”—that is,investors stuck solely to investment-grade securities as a pack.This herd instinct,according to him,was flawed in several ways.His attribution to the instinct of investors as herd-like was made while he advocated the use of “junk bonds” as a debt instrument.Encouraging investors to look at qualitative considerations—such as man- agement’s ability and its vision of the future rather than sticking to the size,historical record,and industry position of the company—he was successful in fueling the growth of the junk bond market.
A similar event occurred in the early part of the twenty-first century,when the housing boom and economic recovery encouraged a heavy spiraling in subprime mortgage lending.This increase saw a parallel increase in the securities offered through a pooling of such subprime mortgage loans through the process of “securitization.” Investors moved from buying pooled mortgage loans—securitized and sold on the backing of the full faith and credit of government and quasigovernment agencies—to what is referred to as “non-agency transactions”:ones where the willing investor undertakes the risk of the underlying mortgage loan.Such a transaction consisted of the issuance of securities out of a pool of mortgage loans without any backing of governmental funds.The contagion gripped the financial markets,and the herd instinct manifested itself in a situation where investors jumped in significant numbers to take advantage of the booming housing market that prevailed in the early years of the new millennium.Capital markets engaged in technological innovations for the riskier category of investors—something like a “diverse maturity mortgage product,” which led to pooling of mortgage loans with varied credit ratings into securities.Many conditions conducive to subprime lending and securitization of such loans induced investors to take the risk of investing in such loans.But the expectations contained in these risks did not materialize.And fears grew of a looming economic crisis that might result from numerous delinquencies for such loans—not just in the United States but all over the world.
Many moons ago,Michael Milken,the director of low-grade bond research at Drexel,Burnham and Lambert,observed that investment in the corporate debt markets often reflected a “herd instinct”—that is,investors stuck solely to investment-grade securities as a pack.This herd instinct,according to him,was flawed in several ways.His attribution to the instinct of investors as herd-like was made while he advocated the use of “junk bonds” as a debt instrument.Encouraging investors to look at qualitative considerations—such as man- agement’s ability and its vision of the future rather than sticking to the size,historical record,and industry position of the company—he was successful in fueling the growth of the junk bond market.
A similar event occurred in the early part of the twenty-first century,when the housing boom and economic recovery encouraged a heavy spiraling in subprime mortgage lending.This increase saw a parallel increase in the securities offered through a pooling of such subprime mortgage loans through the process of “securitization.” Investors moved from buying pooled mortgage loans—securitized and sold on the backing of the full faith and credit of government and quasigovernment agencies—to what is referred to as “non-agency transactions”:ones where the willing investor undertakes the risk of the underlying mortgage loan.Such a transaction consisted of the issuance of securities out of a pool of mortgage loans without any backing of governmental funds.The contagion gripped the financial markets,and the herd instinct manifested itself in a situation where investors jumped in significant numbers to take advantage of the booming housing market that prevailed in the early years of the new millennium.Capital markets engaged in technological innovations for the riskier category of investors—something like a “diverse maturity mortgage product,” which led to pooling of mortgage loans with varied credit ratings into securities.Many conditions conducive to subprime lending and securitization of such loans induced investors to take the risk of investing in such loans.But the expectations contained in these risks did not materialize.And fears grew of a looming economic crisis that might result from numerous delinquencies for such loans—not just in the United States but all over the world.
英語人氣:125 ℃時間:2020-04-19 12:28:54
優(yōu)質(zhì)解答
Many moons ago, Michael Milken, the director of low-grade bond research at Drexel, Burnham and Lambert,很久以前,在德雷克薩爾的低等債券研究員邁克爾·米爾肯,伯納姆和蘭伯特主任指出observed that investmen...
我來回答
類似推薦
猜你喜歡
- 1地球上重1千克的物體到月球上重0.167千克,在月球上中12.5千克的物體,在地球上中多少千克?(保留整數(shù))
- 2一個圓柱形容器,底面半徑是10cm,將一個物體浸入容器內(nèi),水面上升1.5cm,物體體積是?
- 3“染色體”是什么?為什么叫 染色體?
- 41/15÷3.25+8/13× 4/15+4/13÷3.75
- 5形容舍不得離開的成語
- 6電阻在電路中有何作用?
- 7巴蜀英才
- 8將質(zhì)量為1.15gNa用刺了孔的鋁箔包裹后放入水中,共收集到1.232L{標(biāo)況}氣體.
- 9語文反義詞(成語)
- 10如圖,已知∠AOB=40°,點P關(guān)于OA、OB的對稱點分別為C、D,CD交OA、OB于M、N兩點,則∠MPN的度數(shù)是?
- 11若關(guān)于x的方程x2-(a2+b2-6b)x+a2+b2+2a-4b+1=0的兩個實數(shù)根x1,x2滿足x1≤0≤x2≤1,則a2+b2+4a的最小值和最大值分別為( ?。?A.12和5+45 B.-72和5+45 C.-72和12 D.-12
- 12一道數(shù)學(xué)三角函數(shù)幾何題目